Autore
Aceto, AlessioTitolo
La questione della "fallacia naturalistica" tra "analytical jurisprudence" e "new natural law theory"Periodico
Rivista di filosofia del dirittoAnno:
2025 - Fascicolo:
2 - Pagina iniziale:
363 - Pagina finale:
372This paper explores the contrasting approaches of Analytical Jurisprudence and the New Natural Law Theory regarding the naturalistic fallacy. While Analytical Jurisprudence emphasizes a strict separation between facts and moral norms, the New Natural Law theorists argue that moral principles are self-evident and rooted in practical reason, not empirical observation. The study assesses whether either framework avoids the is-ougfallacy and concludes that the New Natural Law Theory provides a more coherent foundation for legal norms by grounding them in universal values discernible through reason.
SICI: 2280-482X(2025)2<363:LQD"NT>2.0.ZU;2-B
Testo completo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.4477/118978Testo completo alternativo:
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.4477/118978Esportazione dati in Refworks (solo per utenti abilitati)
Record salvabile in Zotero
Biblioteche ACNP che possiedono il periodico